Revisions must consider the following criteria for the evaluation of manuscripts: Originality, Significance, Relevance, Presentation and Content.

Considerations for Evaluation Criteria

1. Originality.

• Are the problems discussed in the article new?
• Does the article point out differences from related research?
• Does the article describe an innovative combination of techniques from different disciplines?
• Does the article introduce an idea that appears promising or might stimulate others to develop promising alternatives?

2. Significance.

• Does the article have a considerable contribution to a certain area of research?
• Does the article stimulate discussion of important issues or alternative points of view?

3. Relevance

• Does the article fit in the journal's research areas?
• Does the article present relevant information for its area of research?

4. Presentation

• Does the article have a logic structure?
• Is the article clearly written?
• Is the article correctly written (from the grammar point of view)?
• Is the article correctly formatted?

5. Content

Title

• Does the title clearly express the content of the article?

Abstract

• Is the abstract sufficiently informative?
• Does the abstract describe the research and the results?
• Does the abstract provide a good perspective on the final message of the article?

Keywords

• Are the number of keywords enough?
• Are the keywords representative or relevant?

Introduction

• Does the introduction correctly highlight the current concerns in the area?
• Does the introduction specify the research objectives?

Methodology

• Are the methods used clearly explained?
• Are the methods used validated / recognized?
• Are the data and statistics used reliable?

Results

• Are the results clearly presented?
• Are all relevant connections with others' work/research declared?
• Is the literature used in support of research sufficiently comprehensive and current?
• Do the results sufficiently avoid misinterpretation?
• Do the results sufficiently avoid assumptions and speculations?

Conclusions

• Are the conclusions correctly / logically explained?
• Do the conclusions sufficiently avoid misinterpretation?
•  Do the conclusions sufficiently avoid too general or biased information?

References

• Do the references reflect the latest work/research in the considered area?
• Are the references correctly indicated in the article?
• Are the references properly indexed and recorded in the bibliography using IEEE format?

Tables

• Do the tables correctly indicate the measuring units and the source?
• Are the tables correctly named and numbered?
• Are the data presented in tables correctly valued and interpreted in the article?
• Are the tables well proportioned and aesthetically placed in the article?

Graphs and Figures

• Do the graphs and figures properly illustrate the discussed subject?
• Do the graphs and figures correctly indicate the measuring units and the source?
• Are the graphs and figures correctly named and numbered?
• Are the data presented in graphs and figures correctly valued and interpreted in the article?
• Are the graphs and figures well proportioned and aesthetically placed in the article?
• Are the problems discussed in the article new?