PAGE: Prompt Augmentation for Text Generation Enhancement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33333/lajc.vol13n2.07

Keywords:

Requirements Generation, LLM, Prompt Augmentation, PAGE

Abstract

In recent years, natural language generative models have shown outstanding performance in text generation tasks. However, when facing specific tasks or particular requirements, they may exhibit poor performance or require adjustments that demand large amounts of additional data. This work introduces PAGE (Prompt Augmentation for text Generation Enhancement), a framework designed to assist these models through the use of simple auxiliary modules. These modules—lightweight models such as classifiers or extractors—provide inferences from the input text. The output of these auxiliaries is then used to construct an enriched input that improves the quality and controllability of the generation. Unlike other generation-assistance approaches, PAGE does not require auxiliary generative models; instead, it proposes a simpler, modular architecture that is easy to adapt to different tasks. This paper presents the proposal, its components and architecture, and reports a proof of concept in the domain of requirements engineering, where an auxiliary module with a classifier is used to improve the quality of software requirements generation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y. Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu, Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683, 2019.

[2] T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, and D. Amodei, Language Models are Few-Shot Learners, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165, 2020.

[3] H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, A. Rodriguez, A. Joulin, E. Grave, and G. Lample, LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.

[4] A. Mavin, P. Wilkinson, A. Harwood, and M. Novak, “Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax (EARS),” in Proc. 17th IEEE Int. Requirements Engineering Conf. (RE’09), 2009, pp. 317–322.

[5] L. Du, X. Ding, K. Xiong, T. Liu, and B. Qin, “Enhancing pretrained language models with structured commonsense knowledge for textual inference,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 254, p. 109488, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109488.

[6] K. He, J. K. Chen, and P. Kim, “Generative pre-training language models with auxiliary conditional summaries,” Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, Tech. Rep., 2020. [Online]. Available: https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/cs/cs224n/cs224n.1204/reports/custom/report50.pdf

[7] Y. Zeldes, D. Padnos, O. Sharir, and B. Peleg, “Auxiliary tuning and its application to conditional text generation,” arXiv:2006.16823, 2020.

[8] Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Ren, S. Shi, M. Han, Y. Wu, R. Lai, and Z. Cao, “IAG: Induction-Augmented Generation Framework for Answering Reasoning Questions,” in Proc. EMNLP 2023, 2023, pp. 1–14, doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1.

[9] H. Liao, S. He, Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, K. Liu, and J. Zhao, “Awakening Augmented Generation: Learning to awaken internal knowledge of large language models for question answering,” in Proc. 31st Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2025, pp. 1333–1352, Assoc. for Computational Linguistics.

[10] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 5998–6008.

[11] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” in Proc. 2019 Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186.

[12] OpenAI, “ChatGPT,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://chatgpt.com

[13] Prompt Engineering Guide, “Elements of a prompt,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.promptingguide.ai/introduction/elements

[14] C. Y. Lin, “ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries,” in Proc. ACL Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out, Barcelona, Spain, 2004, pp. 74–81.

[15] A. Ferrari, G. O. Spagnolo, and S. Gnesi, “PURE: A dataset of public requirements documents (version 2.0),” in Proc. 25th IEEE Int. Requirements Engineering Conf. (RE), Lisbon, Portugal, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7118517

[16] T. Tahir and K. Tasleem, “Software functional requirements,” Zenodo, Dataset, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15834954

[17] L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, 2001, pp. 5–32, doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324

Published

2026-07-07

Issue

Section

Research Articles for the Regular Issue

How to Cite

[1]
“PAGE: Prompt Augmentation for Text Generation Enhancement”, LAJC, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 84–94, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.33333/lajc.vol13n2.07.